DIGI CITIZEN

DIGI CITIZEN – Reflections on Digital Services and Everyday Life

Digitalization has become a fundamental part of our everyday lives. Services we once accessed face-to-face are now mostly available online. Information has moved from paper to digital platforms, making services faster but also potentially less accessible for those who lack digital skills or tools.
It is important to ask: How can we ensure that everyone has equal access to essential services in this new digital world? Accessibility, inclusivity, and support must remain central in designing and delivering digital services.

Kela, the Social Insurance Institution of Finland, provides essential economic support for residents. I have personally used Kela’s services when applying for parental benefits and student financial aid.

I find Kela’s digital services relatively easy to use: applications can be submitted online through OmaKela, and the progress of applications can be tracked easily. It is also possible to see future payments and benefit decisions through the service.
In case of any issues, help is available via telephone or chat services.

Earlier, I wrote an article comparing the chatbot services of different organizations, and Kela’s chatbot stood out as the best. It was surprisingly human-like and empathetic, offering clear and supportive answers. The quality of the chatbot interaction really enhanced the user experience and gave a positive impression of Kela’s digital customer service.

However, one downside remains: the complexity of some application forms. Even though the service structure is logical for experienced users, I sometimes wonder how the most vulnerable people manage to fill in all the required information.
Additionally, strong identification requirements (such as using bank credentials) might create barriers for some users. Simplifying forms and maintaining a consistent logic throughout the system could make OmaKela even more accessible.

OmaKanta is a Finnish e-healthcare portal that provides access to personal health information and prescriptions. I frequently use OmaKanta to check my medical records and prescription history.

Logging in with bank credentials is straightforward, but finding specific historical data and managing consents between healthcare providers can be confusing.
I appreciate the possibility to renew prescriptions and send messages to healthcare providers directly through the platform. Still, user-friendliness could be improved, especially for elderly users who might benefit most from easier access to their health information.

KEVA is Finland’s largest pension provider for public sector employees. When I checked my own pension information through KEVA’s online service, I noticed that my pension accrual was not yet visible.
The service itself is clear and user-friendly, but not having complete data available reminded me that even well-designed digital systems can sometimes fall short in providing full transparency.

As part of this assignment, I compared prices and customer experience between Amazon and the Finnish online store Verkkokauppa.com.

When browsing similar products, such as electronics and household items, I noticed that Amazon often offers slightly lower base prices. However, when adding shipping costs to Finland and considering customs fees for certain products, the final price on Amazon can end up being higher or at least equal to Verkkokauppa.com.

At Verkkokauppa.com, prices are usually a bit higher at first glance, but the advantage is clear: no hidden costs, faster delivery within Finland, Finnish customer service, and easy returns. Verkkokauppa.com also offers detailed product descriptions in Finnish, and often includes extended warranties or after-sales support for an additional fee.

Digitaalinen asuntokauppa – DIAS is a Finnish digital platform that enables the smooth and secure signing of real estate sales contracts and the transfer of ownership completely online. It connects different stakeholders — banks, real estate agents, and consumers — into a single shared digital process, significantly streamlining what has traditionally been a slow, paperwork-heavy transaction.

One of DIAS’s greatest strengths is that it is developed continuously based on real user feedback. Users such as real estate professionals, banking staff, and private consumers provide insights and suggestions that guide the platform’s improvement. This user-driven development approach ensures that DIAS evolves alongside market needs and technological advancements, keeping it user-friendly, secure, and efficient.

A particular challenge for DIAS is that it does not serve a narrow, clearly defined user group. Instead, it must cater to a very broad audience: from young first-time homebuyers to older individuals selling family homes, and from real estate investors to legal representatives handling estate sales.
This diversity means that the platform must be simple and intuitive enough for users of all ages and backgrounds while also providing professional-level reliability expected by banking institutions and real estate agencies.

Working in connection with DIAS has highlighted to me the importance of accessibility, user-centered design, and continuous iteration in successful digital service development. A truly impactful digital platform isn’t just built once — it’s shaped constantly through listening, adapting, and improving.

Despite all the benefits of digitalization, not everyone can or wants to use virtual services. This creates a digital gap that risks excluding vulnerable groups.

Without access to digital tools or the skills to use them:

  • People can face social exclusion.
  • Access to essential services like healthcare, banking, and social security can become difficult.
  • Economic inequalities can deepen.

To bridge the gap, it’s vital to promote digital skills across all age groups, ensure that non-digital alternatives are still available for critical services, or make digital services so user-friendly that even a 75-year-old could use them safely and confidently.

I completed the digital competence test as part of this assignment.
It was a useful way to evaluate my skills across various areas like information processing, communication, content creation, safety, and problem-solving. To be honest, I felt that there were simply too many questions.

While my digital skills are strong overall, the test highlighted areas where continuous improvement is needed, particularly regarding digital security and the responsible use of online resources.

This assignment helped me realize the double-edged nature of digitalization.
On one hand, services have become faster, more flexible, and more accessible for those with good digital skills.
On the other hand, inclusivity remains a major challenge, and digital literacy cannot be taken for granted.

I learned how important it is to design digital services for everyone, not just for tech-savvy users.
I also deepened my understanding of consumer rights, data privacy risks, and the importance of continuous digital skill development.

In the future, I hope to contribute to making digital services more user-friendly, accessible, and secure for all.

Pictures from: Unsplash.com

I commented these following blogs:

6 Replies to “DIGI CITIZEN”

  1. Thank you, Amanda, for your text. I agree with you about the prices on Verkkokauppa.com and Amazon. At first, when browsing products on Amazon, the prices seem slightly cheaper, but there are always additional costs when the product is shipped to Finland. In 2015, I ordered a composite kitchen sink from Amazon Germany for significantly less than what it would have cost in Finland at the time. However, I’ve noticed that the price differences have decreased considerably over the past ten years, and nowadays, I would order from a Finnish online store, if only because it is domestic. Companies compete fiercely for customers, so there isn’t much difference in pricing anymore, but there is a clear difference in service, ease of returns, and warranties. DIAS- digitaalinen asuntokauppa service was not familiar to me before, so it was interesting to read about it. I thought that if I ever end up buying or selling a home in the future, I would definitely use that service.

    1. Thank you so much for your thoughtful comment!
      I completely agree with you — the situation with Amazon and Verkkokauppa.com has indeed changed a lot over the years. It’s true that nowadays the price differences are smaller, and the overall shopping experience, including returns, guarantees, and customer service, often makes Finnish online stores a better choice.
      I’m also really happy to hear that you found the part about DIAS interesting! It’s a great service that really simplifies the home buying and selling process. If you ever end up using it, I’m sure you will appreciate how smooth and secure the process is.
      Thank you again for taking the time to read my blog and share your experiences!

  2. Hi Amanda,

    Thank you for your great post!
    You have very similar ideas about foreign webstores as I do and I noticed the same thing about the hidden costs that can increase the total price significantly.
    Interesting to hear your thoughts and experiences about Kela’s chatbot. I have not had the need to use it but almost feel like trying it after reading how good it is!
    I do share your though that digital competence test was too long. I almost gave up half way, but luckily I pushed through as the result was interesting to see. Hopefully at the end you had some good ideas too how to improve your weaker areas if they need any improving.
    Best regards,
    Heidi Teräväinen (blogi.savonia.fi/heiditeravainen)

    1. Thank you so much for your comment, Heidi!
      I’m happy to hear you found the post interesting. 😊
      It’s great to see we share similar thoughts, and I really appreciate you taking the time to share your experiences as well!

  3. Hi! It’s great to see that you have similar views and experiences with digital services as I do. Your mention of Kela’s chatbot was interesting—I haven’t had to use that service myself yet. I also agree with you that some customer groups may face challenges when using digital services. It would be essential to consider these groups, for example, from a service guidance perspective when developing software.

    1. Thanks for your thoughtful reply!
      I totally agree — considering different customer groups during development is key, especially when it comes to service guidance and accessibility.
      If you do end up trying Kela’s chatbot at some point, I’d be curious to hear what you think! It’s always interesting to compare how different digital services handle user support.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *